Delhi HC Disposes Plea Seeking Scrapping of NTA in NEET
The Delhi High Court recently refused to entertain a controversial NEET-UG re-exam plea in its present form. Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia led the Division Bench. They observed that the petition improperly combined individual candidate grievances with broad public interest reliefs. Consequently, the court permitted the petitioners to withdraw the petition to file separate, appropriately structured proceedings.
Court Highlights Procedural Flaws in NEET-UG Re-exam Plea
The petition challenged the conduct and outcome of the re-examination while demanding an investigation into alleged irregularities. In addition, the petitioners sought the immediate scrapping of the National Testing Agency. However, the bench raised serious objections to the mixed prayers presented before it. The judges noted that a single writ petition cannot simultaneously pursue private score corrections and sweeping public interest reforms. Therefore, the court declined to adjudicate the factual claims in the current framework.
Centre and NTA Deny Allegations of OMR Tampering
During the hearing, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta firmly opposed the allegations on behalf of the Centre and testing authorities. Furthermore, he categorically denied any malpractice or unauthorized tampering with optical mark recognition sheets. Mehta emphasized that sensational claims should not distort the narrative surrounding national entrance tests. He also maintained that authorities conducted the re-examination under secure and verified protocols. For medical graduates and aspirants looking to advance their professional preparation, exploring structured training like the Foundation Comprehensive Training For New Doctor can offer valuable career grounding.
Petitioners Seek Separation of Individual and Public Reliefs
Following the bench's observations, advocate Abhisht Hela sought permission to withdraw the matter. Counsel clarified that the petitioners will file two distinct proceedings in the near future. First, individual candidates will pursue their specific scorecard and evaluation disputes. Second, a fresh public interest litigation will independently address institutional reforms and testing accountability. As a result, the High Court disposed of the case without ruling on the merits of the malpractice claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q1: Why did the Delhi High Court refuse the petition against the NTA?
The High Court declined the petition because it improperly combined personal grievances with broader public interest demands.
Q2: Did the court rule on allegations of OMR sheet tampering?
No, the court did not evaluate the merits of the tampering claims and only addressed procedural maintainability.
Q3: What next steps will the petitioners take?
The petitioners plan to file separate petitions for individual grievances and institutional testing reforms.
References
- Delhi HC refuses plea seeking scrapping of NTA; probe into alleged NEET-UGre-exam irregularities - ETHealthworld
- 'Mixture Of Prayers': Delhi High Court Refuses To Entertain Plea Seeking NEET Re-Exam Score Correction, Expert Panel & Scrapping Of NTA - Live Law
- No tampering in NEET 2026 retest OMR sheets: Centre tells Delhi HC - Medical Dialogues
